Your web browser is out of date. Update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on this site.

Update your browser
Media Hits

Following Election Integrity Mandate, States Should Take These Steps To Secure Elections

by Staff

Stop RCV Coalition co-chair Jason Snead recently wrote an op-ed in The Daily Wire discussing steps states should take to secure their elections. 

It should also be the year that states put an end to ranked-choice voting (RCV). Time and again, RCV has proven to be confusing, time-consuming, and prone to errors. Proponents claim it improves democracy, but in truth, it does the opposite. Voters must rank candidates, so voting takes longer, and the tortuous process of eliminating candidates and redistributing votes can lead to convoluted—and even incorrect—outcomes. In one glaring example, Oakland, California, certified the wrong winner in an RCV election in 2022. This year in Portland, Oregon, participation plummeted with 20% of voters leaving their ballots entirely blank in the ranked-choice race for city council.

 Before the 2024 election, 10 states passed laws banning RCV. Left-wing donors like John and Laura Arnold fought back, pouring $100 million into RCV ballot measures in six states. Voters rejected them all, in red and blue states alike, while Missouri voters enshrined an RCV ban in the state constitution. But the cabal behind RCV isn’t stopping. They now say they will lobby legislatures to impose what the voters just rejected. The best response from lawmakers would be to ban RCV instead. That will keep voting simple. 

Ranked-Choice Voting News Roundup - January 2026

by Staff

From the States

Indiana Legislature inches towards banning ranked-choice voting

by Harry Roth

Recent News

Rank MI Vote loss was a big deal

by Trent England

Recent News

Are RCV donors done?

by Trent England

Join the Fight

Help us defeat the push for Ranked-Choice Voting.